katie allison granju

I don’t want to sell anything, buy anything, or process anything as a career. I don’t want to sell anything bought or processed, or buy anything sold or processed, or process anything sold, bought, or processed, or repair anything sold, bought, or processed. You know, as a career, I don’t want to do that.

 

For decades, the foremost rule of family sleep, as… May 6, 2002

Filed under: sundry — katie allison granju @ 1:20 pm

For decades, the foremost rule of family sleep, as promulgated by

mainstream American parenting experts, has been that infants and

children should never be allowed to sleep with their parents. Last week,

the U.S. Consumer Products Safety Commission (CPSC) even got in on the

act, warning us that the practice of parents sleeping with their

babies is inherently dangerous and should be avoided. After giving

birth to three children in six years, I can tell you that these

parenting police are way off the mark: the family bed is a sanity and

sleep saver
for mothers and babies.

In anthropological surveys of families around the world, researchers

have repeatedly noted that American and other western parents are

unique in their practice of placing infants in separate sleep spaces

rather than in a co-sleeping arrangement with one or both parents. In

most cultures, the idea of leaving a tiny baby alone in a bed with

bars, placed in a room separate from parents is considered as unsafe

and bizarre as if we left our napping baby alone to run out to the grocery store.

“… almost all human infants for the past million or so years have

slept in contact with an adult. And even today, in most places in the

world, infants spend their first year co-sleeping,” writes

anthropologist Dr. Meredith Small in her best-selling book, Our Babies,

Ourselves; How Biology and Culture Shape the Way We Parent
(Doubleday,

1998)

In their statements to the press, officials from the CPSC — a

government agency that generally reviews product safety rather than

cultural practices or parenting styles — noted that in a review of

death certificates dating between 1990 and 1997, researchers found 515

instances of American infants who died of suffocation or strangulation

while sleeping in some type of “adult bed.” What the CPSC failed to

note, however, is that more than 2,000 infants die each year while

asleep in cribs, bassinets, and cradles. In many cases, these babies

expire from the tragic and still poorly understood phenomenon of SIDS.

In other instances, infants are put to sleep in baby beds with unsafe,

outdated design features, or they suffocate from bedding that is too

soft or in which they become entangled. Yet no one from the government

has come forward to offer a sweeping conclusion that solitary sleeping

is de facto unsafe for babies and should always be avoided.

Perhaps not coincidentally, our solitary-sleeping American babies have

the highest rates of “crib death” in the world. Intriguing data from a

National Insitutes of Health researcher indicate that SIDS rates remain

low among communities of co-sleeping Asian families who immigrate to

the United States, but the number of deaths rises in relation to the

amount of time these families live here, possibly due to the adoption

of American-style customs such as crib-sleeping and bottle-feeding for

babies. Exclusive breastfeeding — which has now been determined to

significantly lower an infant’s statistical risk for SIDS, along with a

host of other potentially fatal maladies - is much more common among

mothers and babies who sleep together, in the United States and

elsewhere. Additionally, researchers have noted that breastfeeding,

co-sleeping infants tend to settle onto their backs or sides alongside

their mothers rather than ending up in the risky face-down sleep

position favored by many babies left to sleep by themselves.

In its recounting of the allegedly startling number of infant deaths

which took place in adult beds, the CPSC’s own statistics revealed that

approximately 80% of the total number actually occurred as a result of

factors unrelated to the fact that the baby was sleeping with another

person. In these cases, babies were placed on bedding that was too

soft, leading to suffocation, or they became trapped face-down on

waterbeds, or wedged between a headboard and a mattress. Clearly,

unsafe, poorly designed sleeping arrangements in which this type of

fatal accident is liable to occur are inappropriate for infants,

whether an adult is sharing the bed with them or not. In the remaining

20% of cases — translating to 121 deaths over a seven year period out

of 4 million live births in the U.S. annually — at least some of the

deaths were attributable not to babies’ parents, but to an unspecified

“caregiver” or sibling rolling on top of the babies. Again, families

who sleep with their babies should be — and generally are — aware

that young infants should only sleep beside a parent, usually a

breastfeeding mother. But the idea that these demonstrably unsafe

family bed arrangements are representative of the majority of

co-sleeping family situations in the U.S. is as absurd as claiming that

the existence of the occasional plane crash means that we should

abandon air travel altogether.

As parenting “experts” have attempted to dissuade American mothers from

sleeping with their babies in the past fifty years, a variety of

arguments have been made. Parents have been warned that co-sleeping

would ruin their marriages, create neurotic children, and now,

according to the CSPC announcement, that it is likely to literally kill

their infants. Yeah right. Personally, I’d prefer for the CPSC to stick

to warning us about things like exploding gas tanks and lead paint. I

have no need for them to come into my bedroom and advise me on how I

choose to raise my children.

 

Leave a Reply

 
 

Bad Behavior has blocked 670 access attempts in the last 7 days.

19 queries. 0.656 seconds.