katie allison granju

I don’t want to sell anything, buy anything, or process anything as a career. I don’t want to sell anything bought or processed, or buy anything sold or processed, or process anything sold, bought, or processed, or repair anything sold, bought, or processed. You know, as a career, I don’t want to do that.

 

An acceptable and particularly mean cultural prejudice January 10, 2008

Filed under: parenting, pregnancy, sundry, writing — katie allison granju @ 8:07 am

Denver mothers who are enrolled in high school are asking for a modest four weeks of approved maternity leave from classes, and all hell is breaking loose over their request. The topic has bloggers and pundits buzzing, with most folks nastily wagging their fingers at the idea that “teen mothers” should get a few weeks to rest their bodies and bond with their babies after giving birth. After all, the reasoning goes, if we “reward” teenage moms with four weeks of no homework, it will surely encourage more 16 year old girls to get knocked up.

Are they NUTS?

First of all, it’s only humane that any woman, of any age, who has just given birth should get a few weeks to physically recover from birth. And the idea that four weeks at home with a newborn baby is some kind of incentive for any teenage girl to get pregnant is just… well…

I wrote an essay about this topic a while back for Metro Pulse. It pretty much encapsulates my thoughts on the topic of teenage motherhood, so I’ll copy it here rather than repeating myself.

IN DEFENSE OF THE PREGNANT PROM QUEEN

by Katie Allison Granju

A few months ago I read an article about a high school in Florida that included a section in its yearbook featuring the students at the school who are also parents. Controversy erupted as many in the community objected vociferously to this supposed glorification of “teen pregnancy.”

I, on the other hand, found it a nice way to honor the accomplishments of this high school’s student-parents. As anyone who has attended school of any kind while a parent will tell you, parenting as a student is damned hard work. I know because I had my first baby while in college and my second baby while in grad school. Juggling baby, bills, and books was mind-numbingly difficult, even with significant family help. So I feel confident in suggesting that the young women who are mothers and students at that high school are pulling off something far more challenging—and certainly more important—than the girls on the cheerleading squad.

Additionally, I worked for two years in the early ’90s as a counselor in a Knoxville-area residential facility for teenagers in foster care and their babies. It was and is a unique program that allows these young mothers to remain with their own children rather than separating them by sending the mother and her child to two separate foster homes. I watched these young women bond with and care for their babies, and I observed the way they were treated with utter disdain by many teachers, employers, and the community at large. That experience opened my eyes to the fact that modern American attitudes toward mothers under the age of 20 constitute a particularly nasty but acceptable cultural prejudice.

Why is a 17-year-old woman with a baby automatically seen as some kind of social disease, but a 22-year-old mother is not? These are not “teen mothers,” any more than African American women are “black mothers” or women who work full time are “day care mothers.” They are just mothers, like all the rest of us; giving birth to and trying to raise our children as well as we can. Imagine the outcry if the media began referring to the many 45-year-old women who spend tens of thousands of dollars on fertility treatments, only to end up paying a much younger woman to actually provide a viable uterus or eggs, as “vanity mothers,” or “elderly mothers,” or “crone mothers.” I don’t think this would go over too well.

While there are certain parenting practices that are acknowledged as universally harmful to children, such as physical or emotional abuse, or neglect, the converse is not necessarily true. There are many ways to be a good mother, or as Bruno Bettelheim put it, “a good enough mother.” By most people’s standards, I was in no way fit or ready to be a mother on that day in 1991 when my baby was placed in my arms for the first time. We were too young, we were too poor, we hadn’t completed our education, our relationship was brand new and pretty unstable…. But because my son’s father and I were lucky enough to be surrounded by people who both offered support and believed in our abilities as parents, we were able to rise to the challenge.

Most teenage girls who become pregnant did not intend to do so. According to a review of American teen pregnancy statistics from the journal Family Planning Perspectives, a large percentage of the fathers of babies born to teenagers are men over the age of 20. Many have exerted some sort of coercion or control over the mothers in question. And many teenage mothers find that parenthood makes pursuing their goals of higher education or career growth extremely difficult.

The answers to these important issues are to not condemn and stigmatize mothers who are teens, but instead to work toward a society where every woman, young and old, has access to health education and health care, as well as the confidence and right to control her own body. And our schools must accommodate the fact that some students are parents, and offer the same flexibility that mothers who work have begun demanding of employers in recent years. Parenthood shouldn’t automatically signal an end to educational opportunities for young women.

There is nothing inherently shameful about young motherhood. It isn’t a dirty secret of some kind. We should resist our cultural inclination to turn mothers who are teenagers into pariahs. Age alone does not define a woman’s ability to nurture and guide her child.

Copyright Katie Allison Granju - All Rights Reserved

————

Now, having said this, I certainly hope that all my children - my two sons and my two daughters - wait until they are well beyond teenagehood to have babies. And if any of them became parents as teenagers, I would be worried and upset and cpncerned about them, just as any mother would. But I wouldn’t consider it the end of the world and I wouldn’t try to punish them by making pregnancy and parenting as difficult as possible for them. Instead, I’d try to support and guide them so they could be the best parents they could be, and still complete their educations and maybe even have some fun once in a while.

Teenage parents are people too, you know.

 
 

baby farming? December 31, 2007

Filed under: pregnancy — katie allison granju @ 11:27 am

Sharon Cobb points to a new trend in outsourcing to India: houses full of poor women being paid to serve as surrogate “wombs for rent” for infertile couples in the U.S., Britian and elsewhere.

A team of maids, cooks and doctors looks after the women, whose pregnancies would be unusual anywhere else but are common here. The young mothers of Anand, a place famous for its milk, are pregnant with the children of infertile couples from around the world.

The small clinic at Kaival Hospital matches infertile couples with local women, cares for the women during pregnancy and delivery, and counsels them afterward. Anand’s surrogate mothers, pioneers in the growing field of outsourced pregnancies, have given birth to roughly 40 babies.

More than 50 women in this city are now pregnant with the children of couples from the United States, Taiwan, Britain and beyond. The women earn more than many would make in 15 years. But the program raises a host of uncomfortable questions that touch on morals and modern science, exploitation and globalization, and that most natural of desires: to have a family.

Dr. Nayna Patel, the woman behind Anand’s baby boom, defends her work as meaningful for everyone involved.

“There is this one woman who desperately needs a baby and cannot have her own child without the help of a surrogate. And at the other end there is this woman who badly wants to help her [own] family,” Patel said. “If this female wants to help the other one … why not allow that? … It’s not for any bad cause. They’re helping one another to have a new life in this world.”

Your thoughts?

I am always hesitant to cast judgment on other women’s reproductive choices. Also, as someone who has never faced the hell that is infertility, I can’t imagine what that’s like or what previously unimaginable options it might present.

But I think this story raises some big issues about exploitation. And how is it that prostitution is illegal but it’s legal for women to utilize their bodies in this way?

 
 

babies, babies, babies December 14, 2007

Filed under: parenting, pregnancy, sundry — katie allison granju @ 1:04 pm

As I’ve mentioned before, Jon and I are wrangling with whne would be the best time to have another (our last) bambino. I am 40 years old, so time’s a-wastin’. And I’d like the three oldest kiddos to have as much time as possible with baby siblings before they are all grown and out of the house… J. and E. in particular are so sweet and wonderful with their baby sister. It’s a joy to watch. And if we don’t have another baby, C. would eventually be a faux “only” since the other kids are 9, 12 and 16 years older than she is…

But it’s a tricky thing to figure out, mainly because of childcare issues. Could Jon take TWO babies to work even one day a week? Would his mother want to help even more than she does for a few years until preschool age? And what’s the ideal spacing, given my age? And I’d eventually like to get back to my fighting weight/size…

Sounds like BABY DADDY IS WRESTLING WITH PRETTY MUCH THE SAME QUESTIONS (well, except for the three much-older siblings part).

You know, as the mother of four children, all born at very different times/stages of my life, each under fairly different circumstances, I can say one thing with certainty: there is never a perfect time to have a baby. There will always be pros and cons to every timing decision.

And then there’s always the option to not have another one at all…

 
 

worst baby name ever? December 10, 2007

Filed under: other bloggers, parenting, pregnancy, sundry — katie allison granju @ 3:18 pm

POSSIBLY SO.

 
 

best baby blogging

Filed under: family, other bloggers, pregnancy, sundry — katie allison granju @ 1:29 pm

That’s the designation Jon and I received in the KnoxViews BEST OF 2007 ROUND-UP.

Someday I hope to be known for something other than my prodigious fertility….

;-)

 
 

cindy crawford is human after all December 4, 2007

Filed under: pregnancy, sundry — katie allison granju @ 9:38 pm

Check out this UNairbrushed photo of 41 year old CINDY CRAWFORD.

Ah, childbirth…

 
 

and the grand total is…. December 2, 2007

Filed under: pregnancy, sundry — katie allison granju @ 4:35 pm

The year is almost over and I’ve tallied up how much I will have spent on health care in 2007. Counting BC/BS premiums for the family, plus out of pocket expenses to meet deductibles and pay for all the stuff my “good” insurance didn’t deign to cover, we will have spent around $11,000 this year. Yes, you read that right.

And no one was critically ill. No one needed chemotherapy. We did have maternity care which ended with a c-section. Plus Jon had one minor outpatient surgery and I had one minor outpatient surgery. The kids were super healthy this year.

Not only has the cost been astronomical (and frankly, more than a little bit of a hardship - we’ll be paying off this $11,000 for months to come into the next year), I have also found the bills themselves overwhelming. Every day we get some new bill for $28 or $675 from some lab or specialist I didn’t even realize I saw during the 5 days I was hospitalized giving birth. We are STILL getting bills 4 months after the fact. I didn’t do a good enough job of matching bills to Explanation of Benefits statements as we went along, so it’s likely I’ve paid some things I shouldn’t have, had I been on the ball enough to argue about it. But the whole thing has just been overwhelming.

I am looking forward to getting all this behind us. But I sure am grateful that we have insurance at all, even though it proved to be incredibly weak.

 
 

i am balding November 29, 2007

Filed under: pregnancy, sundry — katie allison granju @ 9:36 am

Yesterday Jon asked me if I’d cut my hair. “It looks really different,” he mentioned.

I told him it looked so flat and weird because I’d tried a new conditioner. In fact, however, it mostly looks so flat and weird because, well….all my hair is falling out.

Yes, it’s coming out in big clumps whenever I wash it or brush it, and apparently this rather disturbing development is a DELIGHTFUL POSTPARTUM SYMPTOM I’d been lucky enough to avoid in my previous pregnancies, but have this time.

It’s really terrible. It just started about a week ago and now I definitely have half the hair I had last month. It looks awful and feels even worse. Apparently, however, I can count on it growing back within the next six months. Until then, I will be wearing more hats than usual…

 
 

only in yemen…or maybe somalia November 21, 2007

Filed under: breastfeeding, pregnancy, sundry — katie allison granju @ 11:59 am

NEW CAMPAIGN calls on pregnant, breastfeeding women to QUIT CHEWING QAT.

 
 

Processing the c-section November 14, 2007

Filed under: pregnancy, sundry — katie allison granju @ 8:11 am

So it has now been almost four months since MY C-SECTION, so I’ve had some time to think about it and decide how I feel about it.

Really, I find that I have no strong feelings about it one way or another. Physically, my recovery was only slightly harder than my recovery with my three previous uncomplicated births. I hurt a little more for a little bit longer, and getting the surgical staples out a few days after I came home was not so much fun, but it wasn’t too bad. I know that it’s major surgery, and some women really have a tough time recovering physically, but this wasn’t the case for me.

I’ve gone over and over in my mind how we might have prevented it, and I honestly don’t know what I could have done differently. I went into preterm labor at just under 36 weeks. My midwife tried to stop my contractions (with brethine) but couldn’t. She sent me to the hospital, where it was discovered the baby was breech, so I had a version to turn her. The hospital tried to stop my labor but couldn’t.

So I then labored for five days and never dilated past one centimeter - probably because the baby was high and floating and not engaged. But the labor was intense. I tried everything to make it more productive. By the end of five days, I was absolutely and completely exhausted. I had been contracting regularly for days and days and was getting nowhere.

Maybe someone more resolute and with a higher pain tolerance than I apparently have could have kept up with the active labor longer than I did, but I was just completely wiped out. My labors with my other babies had been pretty easy. This was a whole new experience.

I have also been thinking about the experience I had with the midwifery practice I saw through most of my pregnancy. I really, really liked the women in the practice as individuals, but I feel let down by how they handled things when my labor didn’t go well. When I was in the hospital, they came to see me (because I was technically still their patient), but I always got the impression that they were irritated with me because I wasn’t progressing. They didn’t seem to believe that I was hurting as much as I was, or that I was as tired as I was.

After the decision was made that I would have a c-section, I never saw or heard from any of them again. That was it. I never so much as got a call asking me how I was feeling. They never checked to see how breastfeeding was going, or how I was doing at home. I realize that after the c-section, I technically became the patient of my OB (whom I love. He delivered my husband, two of my other three children, and all of my sister’s babies), but I still felt like they might have checked up on me. They knew I had had a hard time, and that the baby was a month early… It just seems like they would have wanted to touch base with me.

I do miss having felt that I pushed my baby out into the world. That was an amazing feeling with my other children. But this simply doesn’t bother me as much as I thought it would. In fact, I keep feeling that I should be more upset about having ended up with a c-section than I actually am. I really have no grief or regrets. This surprises me.

Jon and I will likely have another baby. Given my age, this will probably be sooner, rather than later. And at this point, I am leaning toward just having another c-section instead of trying for a VBAC. I know that I am going to stick with my OB this time instead of using anyone else, so we’ll see what he thinks.

And now an admission: my biggest regret about the c-section is a very shallow one. It has really done a number on my belly - the way it looks. The scar is barely noticeable, but the shape of my belly is very different than it was after I had my other babies - and not in a good way. The idea of a tummytuck no longer seems so far fetched ;-)

image62

 
 

ah, so that explains my kids’ brilliance… November 13, 2007

Filed under: pregnancy, sundry — katie allison granju @ 7:58 am

Check it: CURVIER WOMEN HAVE SMARTER CHILDREN.

 
 

martini for PPD October 23, 2007

Filed under: breastfeeding, family, other bloggers, parenting, pregnancy, sundry — katie allison granju @ 8:31 am

Read my friend Adrienne Martini’s most excellent essay on deciding to have a second child after her exceptionally NASTY BOUT WITH POSTPARTUM DEPRESSION the first time around.

 
 

a great book for postpartum mamas October 19, 2007

Filed under: books. movies & music, parenting, pregnancy, sundry, writing — katie allison granju @ 7:36 am

I’ve been meaning to post a rave about my FRIEND MEAGAN’S new(ish) book for postpartum mamas. It’s called THE EVERYTHING GUIDE TO POSTPARTUM CARE and it’s terrific.

There are lots of books about pregnancy that devote a small section near the end to what to expect from your body during the several months following pregnancy, but Meagan’s book gives this important health topic all the attention it’s due. After all, the three or four months after you have a baby are really like a fourth trimester; your body is still undergoing rapid and dramatic changes. Having a guidebook to let you know what’s going on, and what’s normal and what isn’t, is very reassuring.

You would think, having had three babies before C. arrived 11 weeks ago, that I’d know everything I needed to about taking care of myself during the postpartum period, but I actually learned a lot from Meagan’s book. Also, having never had a c-section before (and not having adequately prepared myself for the possibility of one), I found this chapter of the book immensely helpful.

This is a book every pregnant woman needs on her nightstand next to the obligatory pregnancy tomes. I plan to add it to my list of great gifts for pregnant friends.

Highly recommended.

 
 

current reading…and a strange pregnancy side effect October 16, 2007

Filed under: books. movies & music, pregnancy, sundry — katie allison granju @ 12:28 pm

I am generally a voracious reader, but for the entire year I was pregnant, I found that I couldn’t maintain the concentration to read much of anything. It was very bizarre, and very pronounced.

I am happy to say that my appetite for ink seems to be returning, and I am now about 1/3 of the way into this book (thanks Joe!)

book1

The book is a memoir about an American hairdresser’s project to help Afghan women by opening a beauty school. In reading it, I was struck by how many damning (as far as Afghan culture goes) details the memoirist includes about particular Afghan women. I wondered if perhaps including these details - like the story about one of her salon employees faking her own virginity on her wedding night - might get some of these women in trouble once word of the book got out in Afghanistan. Well, it turns out that many of the book’s subjects are now living IN FEAR FOR THEIR LIVES.

 
 

motherbody October 8, 2007

Filed under: activism, breastfeeding, pregnancy, sundry — katie allison granju @ 10:50 am

There’s a real schizophrenia about motherhood these days.

On the one hand, motherhood has never been so chic and hip and hot andAngelina-esque. Motherhood is the new….well, the new something. My generation has made it so, for the first time in history.

But on the other hand, mother’s bodies - what pregnancy and breastfeeding DO TO WOMEN’S PHYSICAL SELVES - are now considered decidedly UN hot. With physical perfection standards becoming increasingly homogenized (porn-chic, anyone?), there is little appreciation for the softer body that comes with creating and sustaining life.

I am sure many men find that extra bit of something that settles around the waist after childbirth actually lovable in their wives - after all, that’s evidence that this woman gave the very significant gift of her body in producing that man’s child - but in general, I think most men and most women think our bodies should look the same as they did before procreation. Of course, with divorce and single motherhood at all time highs, women are likely to be seeking the attention of men who have no connection to the child who was the source of those wider hips, so she’s more likely to want to be rid of it.

So it seems that more and more women are choosing to have MOTHERBODY MAKEOVERS from PLACES LIKE THIS. I’ll admit that if I had an extra 15K lying around, the lipo-tummytuck-breast lift might be pretty tempting. I’d love to be rid of what the c-section appears to have done to my belly. But there is also something vaguely disturbing about this - something anti-feminist and self-hating about it, no? I am torn on the issue.

 
 
 

Bad Behavior has blocked 1658 access attempts in the last 7 days.